New Way of Diciding Title

Avram Grant had urged the Premier League Association to revise its structure and method of deciding title when both teams areequalon points. It's to decide through an additional match played between the two teams.

For me this is a very unfair and stupid idea of deciding. Isn't a 10-months or so season long enough? Isn't there enough games for all teams to do what they suppose and should do? Aren't the teams have a superior goal difference should have the advantages?

Oh maybe I know why he suggested so. There are many other ways to decide the title like what's been adopted in Italy and Spain, aggregate result between the two teams home and away. This is the fairest way of deciding title amongst all of them, and I will agree if all leagues adopt to this method. It's simply because over a season you got to win and lose some matches to different oppositions, and maybe teams now and then got some advantages one over the other etc. So to decide using the total result on both meetings will be the best judge of results.

So why do Avram Grant proposed otherwise? Very simple, everyone should know why! Except Chelsea lost less than Man Utd, all other advantages goes to Man Utd. That's why Avram just suggested playing an additional match because this will suit them most, and nothing could be compared. Don't be silly you Avram Grant! By whichever way, Man Utd is always on top of you, and just a kind reminder, you will never be on top of Man Utd no matter what!